H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-1

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 3–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2009 Brisbane third round 5-7 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 7, 2009* Brisbane ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #41 5-7 6-1 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #96 Match data
Oct 27, 2007* Basel ATP 500 SF Hard Jarkko Nieminen #29 7-6(4) 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #24 Match data
Feb 17, 2007* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #17 3-6 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #20 Match data
Jan 12, 2006* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #29 6-2 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4