H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Mardy Fish H2H: 2-0

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–0 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2013 Winston-Salem third round 7-5 6-7(3) 3-2 RET.

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 21, 2013* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #40 7-5 6-7(3) 3-2 (ret.) Mardy Fish #173 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #26 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 6-1 Mardy Fish #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6