H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Michael Llodra H2H: 1-2
Michael Llodra holds a 2–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 7-6(3) 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Michael Llodra | 7-6(3) 6-4 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2008* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Michael Llodra | 6-3 6-4 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2006* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-4 6-4 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |