H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-4

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 4–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 Valencia quarterfinal 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2015 Tokyo ATP 500 Q1 Q Hard Mikhail Youzhny #92 7-6(3) 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #139 Match data
Oct 26, 2013* Valencia ATP 250 QF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #21 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #41 Match data
Oct 14, 2008* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #33 7-5 3-6 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #23 Match data
Jul 1, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mikhail Youzhny #13 7-5 7-6(5) 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #21 Match data
Mar 1, 2007* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #18 3-6 6-3 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #19 Match data
Feb 3, 2006* Zagreb ATP 250 R16 Carpet Mikhail Youzhny #47 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(0) Jarkko Nieminen #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10