H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-5

Nicolas Almagro holds a 5–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2015 Stockholm third round 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 2015* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #73 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #145 Match data
Jul 29, 2011* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #10 7-6(3) 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #53 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nicolas Almagro #15 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #51 Match data
Jul 16, 2010* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #20 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #63 Match data
Aug 17, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nicolas Almagro #32 6-2 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #28 Match data
Aug 5, 2005* Sopot ATP 250 R16 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #54 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) Nicolas Almagro #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 — — — — — — —