H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 1–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2008 Miami Masters second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 30, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #51 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 — — — — — — —