H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 2-2
Jarkko Nieminen and Nicolas Mahut are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2008 Bangkok fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2008* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Mahut | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2007* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2003* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Nicolas Mahut | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 6-4 7-5 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Nicolas Mahut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |