H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 3-4

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–3 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2013 Montpellier fourth round 6-3 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 8, 2013* Montpellier ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #67 6-3 7-6(8) Nikolay Davydenko #37 Match data
Jul 19, 2012* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #44 5-7 6-4 6-0 Jarkko Nieminen #38 Match data
Jan 6, 2011* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #22 6-4 7-5 Jarkko Nieminen #39 Match data
Aug 8, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-3 7-6(5) Jarkko Nieminen #27 Match data
May 20, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-1 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #17 Match data
May 8, 2003* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #35 7-5 4-6 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #41 Match data
Jan 15, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #41 6-3 3-6 3-6 6-2 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21