H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 4-5

Radek Stepanek holds a 5–4 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2012 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 7-6(3).

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 2012* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #48 6-3 7-6(3) Radek Stepanek #23 Match data
Jan 13, 2012* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #77 7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 Radek Stepanek #31 Match data
Jan 6, 2012* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #28 7-6(3) 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #77 Match data
Aug 5, 2011* Washington ATP 500 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #54 6-4 3-6 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #51 Match data
Oct 9, 2010* Tokyo ATP 500 QF Hard Radek Stepanek #37 (w/o) Jarkko Nieminen #48 Match data
May 7, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Radek Stepanek #27 6-3 3-6 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #25 Match data
May 11, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Radek Stepanek #18 6-4 7-6(5) Jarkko Nieminen #16 Match data
May 3, 2003* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Jarkko Nieminen #35 6-1 6-1 Radek Stepanek #51 Match data
Feb 13, 2003* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #35 6-2 4-6 7-6(1) Radek Stepanek #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5