H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 1-1
Jarkko Nieminen and Sjeng Schalken are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2004 Dubai quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2004* | Dubai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-3 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2001* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 3-6 6-3 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Sjeng Schalken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |