H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Stefan Koubek H2H: 2-1

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–1 lead over Stefan Koubek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2.

FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
AUT Age 49 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarkko Nieminen #67 6-4 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2 Stefan Koubek #121 Match data Jun 23, 2010* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Stefan Koubek #68 6-3 3-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #29 Match data Oct 17, 2007* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jarkko Nieminen #35 6-4 0-6 6-1 Stefan Koubek #60 Match data May 14, 2003* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Stefan Koubek #906 #20 1,143 1,796 195 235 45.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Stefan Koubek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,485 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1996 1–2 33.3% #311 1,482 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 1997 4–2 66.7% #125 1,543 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 1998 2–4 33.3% #93 1,533 0 0
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 1999 29–25 53.7% #46 1,681 0 1
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 2000 26–27 49.1% #54 1,625 0 2
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2001 20–22 47.6% #63 1,697 0 2
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2002 18–31 36.7% #54 1,578 0 2
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 2003 19–24 44.2% #53 1,648 0 3
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2004 22–24 47.8% #60 1,757 0 3
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2005 6–15 28.6% #182 1,570 0 3
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2006 14–9 60.9% #80 1,693 0 3
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2007 22–26 45.8% #47 1,762 0 3
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2008 3–6 33.3% #192 1,704 0 3
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2009 6–11 35.3% #135 1,638 0 3
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2010 3–5 37.5% #131 1,632 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #647 1,602 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Stefan Koubek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 18 14 32 56.3% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 12 13 25 48.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2002 8 17 25 32.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 9 11 20 45.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 8 10 18 44.4% 10 11 21 47.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 92 116 208 44.2% 83 89 172 48.3% 8 19 27 29.6% 12 11 23 52.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 390/430 of Stefan Koubek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Stefan Koubek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 0.0 1.0 76.1% 45.7% 18.2% 0.0% 28.6% 39.1% 37.7%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% 1996 3/3 1.0 3.7 66.3% 48.8% 38.8% 48.3% 43.4% 45.6% 39.8%
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% 1997 5/6 3.2 3.2 61.8% 61.8% 57.4% 46.6% 51.3% 60.1% 47.7%
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% 1998 6/6 2.8 3.0 61.9% 64.4% 44.5% 49.8% 42.8% 56.9% 37.5%
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% 1999 46/54 2.6 2.3 58.6% 66.4% 52.1% 56.8% 40.4% 60.8% 39.5%
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2000 38/53 4.2 3.9 59.6% 67.7% 49.6% 52.4% 40.4% 60.2% 37.0%
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2001 38/42 3.5 3.4 58.2% 66.1% 50.6% 58.1% 43.5% 59.4% 36.3%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2002 39/49 3.5 3.7 58.9% 65.2% 48.6% 48.7% 40.1% 58.3% 37.2%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% 2003 43/43 2.7 2.8 60.0% 65.0% 51.0% 58.8% 39.9% 59.5% 38.5%
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2004 45/46 3.6 3.0 63.1% 65.9% 50.1% 55.2% 39.2% 60.1% 37.6%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2005 21/21 4.3 3.7 60.1% 63.6% 48.3% 56.0% 42.7% 57.4% 36.9%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% 2006 22/23 3.5 3.3 55.8% 68.2% 51.8% 58.7% 40.8% 60.7% 39.0%
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% 2007 48/48 4.0 2.7 59.2% 67.9% 52.4% 56.6% 46.6% 61.4% 37.4%
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2008 9/9 4.6 3.6 58.6% 65.0% 42.6% 46.4% 40.7% 55.7% 34.1%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2009 17/17 3.8 3.1 54.3% 70.4% 50.5% 42.5% 38.1% 60.9% 36.2%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2010 8/8 4.8 3.3 60.6% 61.5% 48.0% 42.1% 41.7% 56.6% 37.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 0.0 2.0 74.0% 51.4% 30.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.0% 30.2%
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 390/430 3.5 3.1 59.5% 66.0% 50.2% 54.1% 41.6% 59.6% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Stefan Koubek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1485 97.3 +0.16 -0.91 0.620 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 1996 1482 96.6 -2.52 -2.52 0.731 43.0% — +24 — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — +0.08
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 -0.24 1997 1543 118.6 -0.10 +1.82 1.193 53.2% — +48 — 62.5% +1.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.15
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 102.3 -1.19 1998 1533 108.9 -0.90 -0.95 0.869 47.6% — +69 — 33.3% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.21
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) 102.4 -0.07 1999 1681 136.8 -0.61 +1.04 1.009 50.2% -157 +114 — 51.6% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -0.19
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) 105.5 -2.46 2000 1625 128.0 -1.07 -0.50 0.930 48.8% +9 +46 -98 48.5% -0.25 9–8 (53%) 10–10 (50%) 102.0 +1.65
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) 102.1 +3.02 2001 1698 130.5 -1.96 -0.75 0.896 48.3% -36 -2 — 45.3% -0.31 9–7 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 -0.37
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 +0.31 2002 1578 131.6 -3.16 -0.15 0.892 47.7% -9 +101 -81 40.5% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 12–7 (63%) 102.3 -0.55
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) 95.3 +1.39 2003 1648 134.0 -1.86 +1.04 0.952 49.2% -22 0 -152 46.3% -0.27 4–8 (33%) 9–2 (82%) 102.4 -1.35
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 +0.07 2004 1757 132.2 -2.49 +0.57 0.941 48.8% -16 -76 -256 45.5% -0.22 11–2 (85%) 9–7 (56%) 114.2 -1.10
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.24 2005 1570 110.6 -3.42 -1.33 0.865 47.6% +70 +14 — 35.8% -0.96 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.3 +0.80
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 98.6 -2.73 2006 1694 126.5 -1.41 +1.06 0.991 49.7% +45 -95 — 51.7% -0.05 9–2 (82%) 6–2 (75%) 112.1 +0.80
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) 100.4 -0.02 2007 1763 141.7 -1.17 +0.49 0.969 49.6% +25 -117 — 47.8% -0.16 8–9 (47%) 9–7 (56%) 103.2 -0.82
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) 101.6 -0.63 2008 1704 118.9 -4.34 -0.28 0.769 45.0% +16 — — 42.3% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 -0.40
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 98.5 -0.46 2009 1639 122.2 -1.09 -0.53 0.926 48.9% +44 -39 -164 41.3% -0.28 1–3 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 93.5 -0.24
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 93.9 +0.18 2010 1633 125.7 -2.71 +0.54 0.867 46.8% +123 — — 47.6% +0.09 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1603 113.9 -0.31 -0.24 0.560 38.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 1796 135.7 -1.82 +0.18 0.932 48.8% -3 +19 -140 45.7% -0.31 69–64 (52%) 84–63 (57%) 111.6 -0.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.