H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Todd Martin H2H: 0-2

Todd Martin holds a 2–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2004 Miami Open round of 64 6-3 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #62 6-3 5-7 7-5 Jarkko Nieminen #31 Match data Mar 24, 2004* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Todd Martin #52 6-3 7-5 Jarkko Nieminen #33 Match data Oct 24, 2002* R32 Stockholm Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Todd Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1%
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 49/51 of Todd Martin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Todd Martin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3%
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Todd Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 -0.24 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 102.3 -1.19 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) 102.4 -0.07 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) 105.5 -2.46 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) 102.1 +3.02 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 +0.31 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) 95.3 +1.39 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 +0.07 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.24 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 98.6 -2.73 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) 100.4 -0.02 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) 101.6 -0.63 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 98.5 -0.46 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 93.9 +0.18 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.