H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-3

Tommy Haas holds a 3–2 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2013 Australian Open first round 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 4-6 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #70 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 4-6 8-6 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
Mar 10, 2012* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Tommy Haas #169 7-6(9) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #44 Match data
Oct 23, 2009* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #120 (w/o) Tommy Haas #17 Match data
Aug 24, 2002* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #3 3-6 6-4 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #34 Match data
Jun 2, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Tommy Haas #3 6-3 7-5 2-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15