H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Yevgeny Kafelnikov H2H: 3-1

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 3–1 lead over Yevgeny Kafelnikov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on clay, while Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2003 Munich semifinal 6-4 0-1 RET.

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
RUS Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 3, 2003* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Jarkko Nieminen #35 6-4 0-1 (ret.) Yevgeny Kafelnikov #25 Match data
Apr 17, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #38 3-6 6-2 6-2 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #27 Match data
Feb 1, 2003* Milan ATP 250 SF Carpet Yevgeny Kafelnikov #26 7-6(8) 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #37 Match data
Jan 17, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #41 6-3 6-3 3-6 4-6 6-1 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yevgeny Kafelnikov #636 #1 3,917 2,071 568 281 66.9% 2 0 0 0 23 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Yevgeny Kafelnikov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #275 1,477 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1993 10–10 50.0% #102 1,588 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 1994 60–27 69.0% #11 1,888 0 3
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 1995 69–27 71.9% #6 1,875 0 7
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 1996 73–25 74.5% #3 1,972 1 11
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 1997 54–26 67.5% #5 1,955 1 14
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 1998 55–29 65.5% #11 1,950 1 17
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 1999 59–29 67.0% #2 1,922 2 20
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2000 58–31 65.2% #5 1,859 2 21
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2001 64–26 71.1% #4 1,979 2 23
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2002 36–23 61.0% #27 1,809 2 25
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2003 29–24 54.7% #41 1,708 2 25
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2