H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jason Stoltenberg vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-1
Jason Stoltenberg and David Prinosil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on clay, while Jason Stoltenberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1999 Rome Masters third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1999* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-0 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1998* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jason Stoltenberg | 7-6(5) 6-1 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason Stoltenberg | #556 | #19 | 1,299 | 1,923 | 294 | 259 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jason Stoltenberg | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #413 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #108 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #168 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #80 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #31 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #79 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #27 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |