H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jason Stoltenberg vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-1

Jason Stoltenberg holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jason Stoltenberg leads 2–0 on grass, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jason Stoltenberg won the 2000 Atlanta semifinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jason Stoltenberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 15, 2000* Atlanta ATP 250 SF Clay Jason Stoltenberg #92 6-2 6-4 Jeff Tarango #74 Match data
Oct 15, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jeff Tarango #72 6-2 6-2 Jason Stoltenberg #36 Match data
Jun 26, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jason Stoltenberg #43 6-4 2-6 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #50 Match data
Jun 19, 1997* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Jason Stoltenberg #36 6-4 6-2 Jeff Tarango #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jason Stoltenberg #556 #19 1,299 1,923 294 259 53.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jason Stoltenberg Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 1–4 20.0% #413 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 13–11 54.2% #70 1,640 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1989 20–18 52.6% #84 1,692 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1990 17–19 47.2% #108 1,679 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1991 20–20 50.0% #75 1,716 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1992 10–16 38.5% #168 1,621 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1993 23–21 52.3% #44 1,694 0 1 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1994 38–25 60.3% #21 1,772 0 2 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1995 21–23 47.7% #80 1,736 0 2 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1996 32–25 56.1% #31 1,767 0 3 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1997 21–15 58.3% #79 1,768 0 4 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1998 32–23 58.2% #27 1,789 0 4 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1999 18–18 50.0% #80 1,715 0 4 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2000 21–14 60.0% #66 1,689 0 4 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2001 7–7 50.0% #185 1,681 0 4 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2