H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jason Stoltenberg vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-2
Justin Gimelstob holds a 2–1 lead over Jason Stoltenberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1999 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1999* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 6-2 6-3 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1999* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jason Stoltenberg | 6-0 6-7(5) 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1998* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Justin Gimelstob | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason Stoltenberg | #556 | #19 | 1,299 | 1,923 | 294 | 259 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jason Stoltenberg | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #413 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #108 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #168 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #80 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #31 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #79 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #27 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2001 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |