H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaume Munar vs Benoit Paire H2H: 2-2
Jaume Munar and Benoit Paire are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Jaume Munar won the 2022 Cordoba third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2022* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaume Munar | 6-4 7-5 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| May 28, 2021* | Parma | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jaume Munar | 7-5 3-1 (ret.) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2019* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-1 6-3 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2015* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 6-2 6-2 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Benoit Paire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |