H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Jaume Munar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2022 Winston-Salem Open third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | 4-1 (ret.) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Apr 7, 2024* | Q1 | Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-3 | Jaume Munar | Match data | Aug 25, 2022* | R16 | Winston-Salem Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #55 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,889 | 131 | 166 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 120 | 122 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #62 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2023 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2024 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | 2025 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | 2026 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 48 | 66 | 114 | 42.1% | 75 | 83 | 158 | 47.5% | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | — | 76 | 76 | 152 | 50.0% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 295/298 of Jaume Munar's and 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2015 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 60.5% | 65.9% | 52.5% | 46.7% | 62.5% | 60.8% | 30.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 57.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 34.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 19/19 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 63.3% | 68.6% | 49.8% | 59.4% | 40.6% | 61.5% | 36.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 39/39 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 62.5% | 70.0% | 48.4% | 49.3% | 39.5% | 61.9% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 11/11 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 63.8% | 65.6% | 49.4% | 55.2% | 34.2% | 59.8% | 38.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 31/31 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 68.3% | 67.4% | 46.1% | 58.9% | 38.1% | 60.5% | 39.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 43/43 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 62.9% | 69.1% | 48.0% | 59.9% | 38.8% | 61.3% | 38.9% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2023 | 34/34 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 68.5% | 65.6% | 47.2% | 48.8% | 38.2% | 59.6% | 38.2% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | 2024 | 36/37 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 65.3% | 66.9% | 46.9% | 57.5% | 38.3% | 60.3% | 41.6% | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | 2025 | 54/54 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 63.3% | 72.9% | 52.1% | 58.9% | 43.1% | 65.2% | 38.6% | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | 2026 | 24/26 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 62.9% | 72.5% | 51.3% | 56.0% | 30.0% | 64.5% | 37.3% | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 39/40 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 62.0% | 73.3% | 45.7% | 64.1% | 46.5% | 62.9% | 38.8% |
| Career | — | 295/298 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 64.4% | 69.1% | 48.9% | 55.9% | 39.1% | 61.9% | 38.7% | — | 241/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.7% | 47.2% | 59.5% | 41.0% | 62.3% | 37.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1560 | 110.6 | +0.57 | -1.60 | 0.780 | 48.7% | — | +69 | — | 20.0% | -2.80 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1545 | 103.4 | -0.04 | -1.76 | 0.679 | 41.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 1511 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1690 | 138.0 | -0.82 | -0.16 | 0.955 | 49.2% | -94 | +52 | — | 44.2% | -0.46 | 4–2 (67%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | -0.59 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 1627 | 136.4 | -1.65 | +1.07 | 1.007 | 50.1% | -46 | +106 | -135 | 44.8% | -0.19 | 8–7 (53%) | 12–10 (55%) | — | +0.18 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 1617 | 129.1 | -1.68 | +0.96 | 0.964 | 48.8% | -29 | +83 | — | 39.3% | -0.61 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 1605 | 131.6 | -1.94 | +1.62 | 0.990 | 49.8% | -57 | +99 | — | 44.2% | -0.32 | 1–9 (10%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.05 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 1695 | 143.5 | -1.83 | +1.63 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -50 | +96 | -236 | 48.2% | -0.09 | 4–11 (27%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | -1.17 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1658 | 124.2 | -3.81 | +1.89 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -133 | +116 | — | 45.1% | -0.49 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +2.14 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1642 | 136.2 | -2.62 | +3.78 | 1.047 | 50.7% | -115 | +81 | -133 | 43.2% | -0.15 | 0–10 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | -0.46 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1857 | 153.9 | +1.09 | +2.91 | 1.109 | 51.7% | -46 | -150 | -240 | 54.6% | +0.53 | 10–12 (45%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | -1.61 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1785 | 131.8 | +0.38 | +1.05 | 1.048 | 50.6% | +50 | -120 | -157 | 49.2% | -0.03 | 4–2 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.39 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1767 | 145.3 | -1.13 | +2.61 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +45 | -62 | -126 | 55.0% | +0.31 | 4–8 (33%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | -0.28 |
| Career | — | 1890 | 143.6 | -1.33 | +1.85 | 1.013 | 50.2% | -54 | +62 | -184 | 46.7% | -0.13 | 36–64 (36%) | 55–58 (49%) | 97.0 | -0.96 | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.94 | +1.97 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -47 | -84 | 48.7% | -0.07 | 38–38 (50%) | 61–53 (54%) | 105.1 | -2.55 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 1 | 7 | 8 | Apr 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Francisco Cerundolo | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 1, 2024 | H2H |
| Diego Schwartzman | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 26, 2022 | H2H |
| Matteo Arnaldi | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |