H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jaume Munar vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 0-1
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Jaume Munar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2022 Winston-Salem fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2024* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Jaume Munar | 4-1 (ret.) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2022* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-3 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |