H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Jaume Munar vs Marin Cilic H2H: 0-3
Marin Cilic holds a 3–0 lead over Jaume Munar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2025 Wimbledon third round 6-3 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2025* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Marin Cilic | 6-3 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2022* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-3 6-3 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2022* | Adelaide 2 | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Marin Cilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 |