H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jaume Munar vs Taro Daniel H2H: 1-1
Jaume Munar and Taro Daniel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaume Munar leads 1–0 on clay, while Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2022 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2022* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-3 6-4 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2018* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jaume Munar | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2017 | Barcelona | ATP 500 | Q1 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 6-2 6-1 | Jaume Munar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaume Munar | #44 | #33 | 1,395 | 1,887 | 129 | 164 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaume Munar | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #81 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #110 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #77 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |