H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jay Berger vs Andres Gomez H2H: 3-2

Jay Berger holds a 3–2 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jay Berger leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Andres Gomez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1989 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jay Berger
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #27 6-4 6-4 Jay Berger #22 Match data Jul 15, 1989* QF U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Jay Berger #39 6-2 6-4 Andres Gomez #22 Match data Mar 16, 1989* R32 Indian Wells Open ATP 500 Hard
Jay Berger #55 6-4 6-4 6-7 6-3 Andres Gomez #9 Match data Mar 16, 1988* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Andres Gomez #10 5-7 6-1 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jay Berger #34 Match data May 31, 1987* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jay Berger #84 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-4 Andres Gomez #10 Match data Feb 28, 1987* R16 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jay Berger #1,121 #7 1,271 1,947 141 80 63.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jay Berger Andres Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1985 3–2 60.0% #250 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1986 7–3 70.0% #82 1,665 0 1 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0
20 1987 28–19 59.6% #47 1,768 0 1 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0
21 1988 28–16 63.6% #34 1,785 0 2 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1
22 1989 41–19 68.3% #10 1,841 0 3 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3
23 1990 32–18 64.0% #18 1,845 0 3 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4
24 1991 2–3 40.0% #387 1,801 0 3 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9
25 — — — — — — — 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10
26 — — — — — — — 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14
27 — — — — — — — 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 — — — — — — — 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15
29 — — — — — — — 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17
30 — — — — — — — 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20
31 — — — — — — — 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21
32 — — — — — — — 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 — — — — — — — 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jay Berger Andres Gomez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 13 9 22 59.1% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1988 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1989 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1990 19 7 26 73.1% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1991 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 42 123 65.9% 50 28 78 64.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jay Berger Andres Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1985 1572 112.9 — — — — +57 — — 57.9% -0.10 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1665 116.1 — — — — -50 -34 — 61.5% -0.04 3–1 (75%) — — +0.72 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20
20 1987 1768 146.6 — — — — -24 -22 — 59.7% +0.65 7–6 (54%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.38 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09
21 1988 1785 145.3 — — — — +58 -65 — 63.1% +1.00 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.25 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54
22 1989 1842 151.4 — — — — -18 +50 — 64.2% +1.07 10–6 (63%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.56 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90
23 1990 1845 149.4 — — — — +64 -35 — 56.8% +0.30 13–6 (68%) 10–4 (71%) — +2.67 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48
24 1991 1801 113.3 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +47 — — 46.2% +0.16 — — — +0.13 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27
Career — 1948 150.8 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +20 -16 — 60.6% +0.68 39–26 (60%) 26–25 (51%) 102.1 +1.89 — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.