H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jay Berger vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Jay Berger holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jay Berger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jay Berger won the 1989 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jay Berger
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jay Berger #28 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-2 Diego Nargiso #96 Match data May 31, 1989* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jay Berger #1,121 #7 1,271 1,947 141 80 63.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jay Berger Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1985 3–2 60.0% #250 1,571 0 0 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 1986 7–3 70.0% #82 1,665 0 1 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1987 28–19 59.6% #47 1,768 0 1 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1988 28–16 63.6% #34 1,785 0 2 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1989 41–19 68.3% #10 1,841 0 3 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1990 32–18 64.0% #18 1,845 0 3 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1991 2–3 40.0% #387 1,801 0 3 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jay Berger Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1987 13 9 22 59.1% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1988 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1989 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1990 19 7 26 73.1% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1991 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 42 123 65.9% 50 28 78 64.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 3/5 of Jay Berger's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jay Berger Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 1991 3/5 1.7 5.0 53.8% 71.5% 39.4% 51.9% 43.3% 56.6% 42.5% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jay Berger Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 1985 1572 112.9 — — — — +57 — — 57.9% -0.10 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.70 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18
19 1986 1665 116.1 — — — — -50 -34 — 61.5% -0.04 3–1 (75%) — — +0.72 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78
20 1987 1768 146.6 — — — — -24 -22 — 59.7% +0.65 7–6 (54%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.38 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1988 1785 145.3 — — — — +58 -65 — 63.1% +1.00 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.25 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69
22 1989 1842 151.4 — — — — -18 +50 — 64.2% +1.07 10–6 (63%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.56 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22
23 1990 1845 149.4 — — — — +64 -35 — 56.8% +0.30 13–6 (68%) 10–4 (71%) — +2.67 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26
24 1991 1801 113.3 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +47 — — 46.2% +0.16 — — — +0.13 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50
Career — 1948 150.8 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +20 -16 — 60.6% +0.68 39–26 (60%) 26–25 (51%) 102.1 +1.89 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.