H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Jay Lapidus vs Paolo Bertolucci H2H: 1-0
Jay Lapidus holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Bertolucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jay Lapidus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jay Lapidus won the 1981 Palermo third round 6-4 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 74
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1981* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jay Lapidus | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Paolo Bertolucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paolo Bertolucci | #382 | #12 | 0 | 1,930 | 198 | 150 | 56.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jay Lapidus | Paolo Bertolucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #50 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #158 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #72 | 1,761 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,657 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #285 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |