H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jay Lapidus vs Vitas Gerulaitis H2H: 1-1
Jay Lapidus and Vitas Gerulaitis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jay Lapidus leads 1–0 on carpet, while Vitas Gerulaitis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jay Lapidus won the 1985 Houston third round 6-3 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1985* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jay Lapidus | 6-3 3-6 7-6 | Vitas Gerulaitis | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1984* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Vitas Gerulaitis | 6-3 6-4 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vitas Gerulaitis | #796 | #3 | 0 | 2,238 | 527 | 231 | 69.5% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 26 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jay Lapidus | Vitas Gerulaitis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #45 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–14 | 73.6% | #15 | 1,946 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,955 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 60–16 | 78.9% | #4 | 2,118 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 47–14 | 77.0% | #5 | 2,155 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 71–22 | 76.3% | #4 | 2,168 | 1 | 15 |
| 25 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #9 | 2,011 | 1 | 18 |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #11 | 2,062 | 1 | 19 |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 61–15 | 80.3% | #5 | 2,052 | 1 | 24 |
| 28 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #20 | 1,850 | 1 | 25 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #17 | 1,836 | 1 | 26 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,706 | 1 | 26 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #799 | 1,668 | 1 | 26 |