H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 0-2
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Stuttgart Outdoor third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1994* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-3 6-1 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 7-6 6-2 6-0 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Andrei Chesnokov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 |