H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 0-2
Jacco Eltingh holds a 2–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jacco Eltingh leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1994 Schenectady third round 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1994* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jacco Eltingh | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jacco Eltingh | 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |