H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 0-1
Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1994 Memphis third round 7-5 4-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1994* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 7-5 4-2 (ret.) | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |