H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-3

Jean-Philippe Fleurian and Jim Grabb are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1997 Japan Open round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jean-Philippe Fleurian
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #215 6-3 6-2 Jim Grabb #221 Match data Apr 16, 1997* R64 Japan Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Grabb #76 2-6 6-2 7-6(4) 6-3 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #126 Match data May 27, 1992* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jim Grabb #80 6-4 6-2 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #108 Match data Apr 2, 1992* R32 Singapore ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #65 7-5 4-6 6-3 Jim Grabb #114 Match data Aug 7, 1991* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #58 6-4 7-5 Jim Grabb #77 Match data Feb 20, 1991* R64 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Grabb #71 6-2 7-6 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #83 Match data Apr 25, 1987* SF Seoul ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #1,024 #37 645 1,759 106 156 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 0–2 0.0% #151 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 6–3 66.7% #78 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1987 4–11 26.7% #129 1,526 0 0 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1988 3–7 30.0% #108 1,491 0 0 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1989 12–11 52.2% #78 1,638 0 0 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1990 23–29 44.2% #67 1,618 0 0 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1991 20–28 41.7% #73 1,584 0 0 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1992 1–11 8.3% #223 1,491 0 0 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 1993 1–4 20.0% #106 1,458 0 0 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 1994 19–21 47.5% #96 1,584 0 0 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 1995 4–9 30.8% #158 1,547 0 0 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 1996 9–15 37.5% #115 1,580 0 0 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 1997 4–5 44.4% #247 1,575 0 0 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1990 17 15 32 53.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1991 10 17 27 37.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1997 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 59 85 144 41.0% 27 44 71 38.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 14 18 32 43.8% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 133/151 of Jean-Philippe Fleurian's and 169/198 of Jim Grabb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Jim Grabb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 43/48 3.2 2.9 58.5% 65.9% 50.1% 57.6% 45.4% 59.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 8/12 3.0 4.9 57.0% 62.5% 41.3% 56.7% 50.2% 52.7% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 4/5 3.3 2.5 66.1% 64.5% 44.2% 50.2% 30.4% 57.8% 35.6% 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3%
28 1994 38/40 3.4 2.8 57.8% 69.3% 51.5% 62.3% 46.0% 61.8% 39.9% 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6%
29 1995 10/13 3.4 2.6 59.2% 66.7% 51.5% 53.6% 35.5% 60.0% 33.1% 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2%
30 1996 22/24 3.2 2.5 59.3% 69.1% 46.9% 45.3% 35.1% 59.9% 33.5% 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7%
31 1997 8/9 1.5 2.6 60.4% 65.8% 54.3% 64.9% 63.4% 61.0% 36.2% 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5%
Career — 133/262 3.2 2.9 58.8% 67.2% 49.6% 56.8% 44.1% 59.7% 37.3% — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1473 100.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1593 116.2 — — — — +20 -59 — 59.3% +0.22 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 1527 113.2 — — — — +52 -41 — 31.7% -1.27 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.86 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1988 1491 114.6 — — — — +58 -15 — 37.0% -0.74 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.53 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
23 1989 1639 132.5 — — — — -41 -47 — 53.7% +0.27 3–5 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.40 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31
24 1990 1618 136.2 — — — — +34 -39 — 47.0% -0.13 8–13 (38%) 10–13 (43%) — -0.54 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31
25 1991 1585 131.0 -1.30 -0.21 0.948 49.4% -46 +40 -3 45.5% -0.20 7–10 (41%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.26 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18
26 1992 1492 107.3 -3.38 -1.76 0.719 43.9% -10 +59 — 21.9% -1.53 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.48 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
27 1993 1458 103.6 -1.27 -2.28 0.843 46.2% — +74 — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.38 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72
28 1994 1584 134.3 +0.12 +0.95 1.044 51.2% -69 +41 +35 48.9% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 3–13 (19%) — +1.05 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42
29 1995 1548 113.0 -1.51 -3.23 0.827 47.0% -13 — — 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.15 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36
30 1996 1580 131.7 -0.94 -1.50 0.836 46.7% +26 — — 33.9% -1.20 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.99 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09
31 1997 1576 108.6 -1.70 -1.08 0.928 48.6% -5 — +76 47.6% 0.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.85 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 1759 133.6 -1.00 -0.53 0.926 48.8% -7 +5 +36 43.1% -0.38 31–51 (38%) 41–62 (40%) 92.0 +1.30 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.