H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-3

Jean-Philippe Fleurian and Jim Grabb are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1997 Tokyo second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jean-Philippe Fleurian
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 1997* Tokyo ATP 250 R64 Hard Jean-Philippe Fleurian #215 6-3 6-2 Jim Grabb #221 Match data
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jim Grabb #76 2-6 6-2 7-6(4) 6-3 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #126 Match data
Apr 2, 1992* Singapore ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Grabb #80 6-4 6-2 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #108 Match data
Aug 7, 1991* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jean-Philippe Fleurian #65 7-5 4-6 6-3 Jim Grabb #114 Match data
Feb 20, 1991* Memphis ATP 250 R64 Hard Jean-Philippe Fleurian #58 6-4 7-5 Jim Grabb #77 Match data
Apr 25, 1987* Seoul ATP 250 SF Hard Jim Grabb #71 6-2 7-6 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #1,024 #37 645 1,758 106 156 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 0–2 0.0% #151 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 6–3 66.7% #78 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1987 4–11 26.7% #129 1,526 0 0 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1988 3–7 30.0% #108 1,491 0 0 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1989 12–11 52.2% #78 1,638 0 0 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1990 23–29 44.2% #67 1,618 0 0 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1991 20–28 41.7% #73 1,584 0 0 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1992 1–11 8.3% #223 1,491 0 0 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 1993 1–4 20.0% #106 1,457 0 0 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 1994 19–21 47.5% #96 1,583 0 0 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 1995 4–9 30.8% #158 1,547 0 0 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 1996 9–15 37.5% #115 1,578 0 0 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 1997 4–5 44.4% #247 1,574 0 0 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2