H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Jim Pugh H2H: 2-0
Jean-Philippe Fleurian holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Pugh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1991 Los Angeles third round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1991* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Jim Pugh | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1990* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 6-2 7-5 | Jim Pugh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Jim Pugh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |