H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 1-0
Jean-Philippe Fleurian holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1986 Roland Garros second round 3-6 2-6 7-5 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 3-6 2-6 7-5 7-5 7-5 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |