H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 0-2
Jonathan Stark holds a 2–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1996 Singapore third round 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1996* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jonathan Stark | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1994* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 6-0 7-6(9) | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |