H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Ken Flach H2H: 1-0
Jean-Philippe Fleurian holds a 1–0 lead over Ken Flach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1990 Philadelphia second round 7-6 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1990* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Ken Flach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Ken Flach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |