H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Pete Sampras H2H: 0-1
Pete Sampras holds a 1–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1990 Miami Masters fourth round 5-7 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1990* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Pete Sampras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |