H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 1-1
Jean-Philippe Fleurian and Richard Krajicek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1996 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1996* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-3 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 4-6 6-3 2-2 (ret.) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |