H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-2

Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1996 Marseille round of 32 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jean-Philippe Fleurian
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #78 7-6(4) 6-3 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #111 Match data Feb 15, 1996* R32 Marseille World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #84 6-7(4) 6-2 7-5 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #112 Match data Feb 1, 1996* R32 Shanghai Masters World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #1,024 #37 645 1,759 106 156 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 0–2 0.0% #151 1,473 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1986 6–3 66.7% #78 1,593 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 1987 4–11 26.7% #129 1,526 0 0 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 1988 3–7 30.0% #108 1,491 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1989 12–11 52.2% #78 1,638 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1990 23–29 44.2% #67 1,618 0 0 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 1991 20–28 41.7% #73 1,584 0 0 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 1992 1–11 8.3% #223 1,491 0 0 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 1993 1–4 20.0% #106 1,458 0 0 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 1994 19–21 47.5% #96 1,584 0 0 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 1995 4–9 30.8% #158 1,547 0 0 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 1996 9–15 37.5% #115 1,580 0 0 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 1997 4–5 44.4% #247 1,575 0 0 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1986 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1990 17 15 32 53.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 1991 10 17 27 37.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1997 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 59 85 144 41.0% 27 44 71 38.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 14 18 32 43.8% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 133/151 of Jean-Philippe Fleurian's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 1991 43/48 3.2 2.9 58.5% 65.9% 50.1% 57.6% 45.4% 59.1% 38.8% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 1992 8/12 3.0 4.9 57.0% 62.5% 41.3% 56.7% 50.2% 52.7% 34.0% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 1993 4/5 3.3 2.5 66.1% 64.5% 44.2% 50.2% 30.4% 57.8% 35.6% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 1994 38/40 3.4 2.8 57.8% 69.3% 51.5% 62.3% 46.0% 61.8% 39.9% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 1995 10/13 3.4 2.6 59.2% 66.7% 51.5% 53.6% 35.5% 60.0% 33.1% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 1996 22/24 3.2 2.5 59.3% 69.1% 46.9% 45.3% 35.1% 59.9% 33.5% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 1997 8/9 1.5 2.6 60.4% 65.8% 54.3% 64.9% 63.4% 61.0% 36.2% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
Career — 133/262 3.2 2.9 58.8% 67.2% 49.6% 56.8% 44.1% 59.7% 37.3% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1473 100.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 1986 1593 116.2 — — — — +20 -59 — 59.3% +0.22 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.77 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 1987 1527 113.2 — — — — +52 -41 — 31.7% -1.27 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.86 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 1988 1491 114.6 — — — — +58 -15 — 37.0% -0.74 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.53 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 1989 1639 132.5 — — — — -41 -47 — 53.7% +0.27 3–5 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.40 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 1990 1618 136.2 — — — — +34 -39 — 47.0% -0.13 8–13 (38%) 10–13 (43%) — -0.54 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 1991 1585 131.0 -1.30 -0.21 0.948 49.4% -46 +40 -3 45.5% -0.20 7–10 (41%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.26 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 1992 1492 107.3 -3.38 -1.76 0.719 43.9% -10 +59 — 21.9% -1.53 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.48 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 1993 1458 103.6 -1.27 -2.28 0.843 46.2% — +74 — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.38 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 1994 1584 134.3 +0.12 +0.95 1.044 51.2% -69 +41 +35 48.9% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 3–13 (19%) — +1.05 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 1995 1548 113.0 -1.51 -3.23 0.827 47.0% -13 — — 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.15 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 1996 1580 131.7 -0.94 -1.50 0.836 46.7% +26 — — 33.9% -1.20 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.99 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 1997 1576 108.6 -1.70 -1.08 0.928 48.6% -5 — +76 47.6% 0.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.85 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
Career — 1759 133.6 -1.00 -0.53 0.926 48.8% -7 +5 +36 43.1% -0.38 31–51 (38%) 41–62 (40%) 92.0 +1.30 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.