H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-2
Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Jean-Philippe Fleurian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1996 Marseille third round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1996* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1996* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-5 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |