H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 1-0

Jean-Philippe Fleurian holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1996 China Open round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jean-Philippe Fleurian
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #106 6-2 6-3 Todd Woodbridge #34 Match data Oct 10, 1996* R32 China Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #1,024 #37 645 1,759 106 156 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1985 0–2 0.0% #151 1,473 0 0 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1986 6–3 66.7% #78 1,593 0 0 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0
21 1987 4–11 26.7% #129 1,526 0 0 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0
22 1988 3–7 30.0% #108 1,491 0 0 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0
23 1989 12–11 52.2% #78 1,638 0 0 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0
24 1990 23–29 44.2% #67 1,618 0 0 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1
25 1991 20–28 41.7% #73 1,584 0 0 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1
26 1992 1–11 8.3% #223 1,491 0 0 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2
27 1993 1–4 20.0% #106 1,458 0 0 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2
28 1994 19–21 47.5% #96 1,584 0 0 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2
29 1995 4–9 30.8% #158 1,547 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 1996 9–15 37.5% #115 1,580 0 0 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2
31 1997 4–5 44.4% #247 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Todd Woodbridge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1986 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
21 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1990 17 15 32 53.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1991 10 17 27 37.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 1997 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 85 144 41.0% 27 44 71 38.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 14 18 32 43.8% — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 133/151 of Jean-Philippe Fleurian's and 360/418 of Todd Woodbridge's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Todd Woodbridge
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 37/48 2.0 3.4 59.8% 67.3% 50.1% 57.0% 43.8% 60.2% 39.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 44/48 2.7 4.8 60.3% 69.2% 48.5% 59.9% 40.7% 60.9% 40.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 33/39 2.4 4.5 60.5% 67.2% 47.6% 51.3% 41.8% 59.2% 39.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 30/34 3.4 4.9 59.1% 70.6% 45.0% 55.4% 47.1% 60.1% 37.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 50/54 2.7 4.6 57.9% 70.2% 48.3% 60.0% 42.9% 61.3% 38.1%
25 1991 43/48 3.2 2.9 58.5% 65.9% 50.1% 57.6% 45.4% 59.1% 38.8% 1996 51/58 3.3 5.3 56.7% 69.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.8% 60.0% 39.2%
26 1992 8/12 3.0 4.9 57.0% 62.5% 41.3% 56.7% 50.2% 52.7% 34.0% 1997 42/51 3.6 4.0 58.4% 70.3% 46.0% 60.1% 45.6% 60.2% 41.4%
27 1993 4/5 3.3 2.5 66.1% 64.5% 44.2% 50.2% 30.4% 57.8% 35.6% 1998 36/42 3.3 4.4 59.1% 64.4% 45.6% 54.0% 46.9% 56.8% 39.9%
28 1994 38/40 3.4 2.8 57.8% 69.3% 51.5% 62.3% 46.0% 61.8% 39.9% 1999 17/24 3.7 4.1 62.5% 66.7% 47.9% 51.7% 49.4% 60.0% 34.8%
29 1995 10/13 3.4 2.6 59.2% 66.7% 51.5% 53.6% 35.5% 60.0% 33.1% 2000 10/10 2.3 4.2 60.2% 66.6% 49.1% 57.1% 52.0% 59.7% 39.4%
30 1996 22/24 3.2 2.5 59.3% 69.1% 46.9% 45.3% 35.1% 59.9% 33.5% 2001 10/10 4.2 5.5 59.8% 66.1% 46.9% 59.1% 33.6% 58.5% 39.4%
31 1997 8/9 1.5 2.6 60.4% 65.8% 54.3% 64.9% 63.4% 61.0% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133/262 3.2 2.9 58.8% 67.2% 49.6% 56.8% 44.1% 59.7% 37.3% — 360/470 3.0 4.5 59.1% 68.4% 47.6% 56.8% 44.0% 59.9% 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Todd Woodbridge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39
19 1985 1473 100.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46
20 1986 1593 116.2 — — — — +20 -59 — 59.3% +0.22 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.77 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95
21 1987 1527 113.2 — — — — +52 -41 — 31.7% -1.27 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.5 +0.86 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18
22 1988 1491 114.6 — — — — +58 -15 — 37.0% -0.74 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +0.53 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10
23 1989 1639 132.5 — — — — -41 -47 — 53.7% +0.27 3–5 (38%) 8–7 (53%) 101.8 +0.40 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36
24 1990 1618 136.2 — — — — +34 -39 — 47.0% -0.13 8–13 (38%) 10–13 (43%) 95.8 -0.54 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85
25 1991 1585 131.0 -1.30 -0.21 0.948 49.4% -46 +40 -3 45.5% -0.20 7–10 (41%) 5–8 (38%) 96.0 +0.26 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28
26 1992 1492 107.3 -3.38 -1.76 0.719 43.9% -10 +59 — 21.9% -1.53 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.9 -0.48 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11
27 1993 1458 103.6 -1.27 -2.28 0.843 46.2% — +74 — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.38 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66
28 1994 1584 134.3 +0.12 +0.95 1.044 51.2% -69 +41 +35 48.9% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 3–13 (19%) 94.7 +1.05 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58
29 1995 1548 113.0 -1.51 -3.23 0.827 47.0% -13 — — 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 1–6 (14%) 99.1 +0.15 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13
30 1996 1580 131.7 -0.94 -1.50 0.836 46.7% +26 — — 33.9% -1.20 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.99 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55
31 1997 1576 108.6 -1.70 -1.08 0.928 48.6% -5 — +76 47.6% 0.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1759 133.6 -1.00 -0.53 0.926 48.8% -7 +5 +36 43.1% -0.38 31–51 (38%) 41–62 (40%) 92.0 +1.30 — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.