H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 2-1
Jean-Philippe Fleurian holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1994 Stuttgart Outdoor second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1994* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 6-2 6-1 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1994* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | 6-2 6-4 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1990* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-2 7-6 | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Philippe Fleurian | #1,024 | #37 | 645 | 1,758 | 106 | 156 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Philippe Fleurian | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #78 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #129 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #78 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #223 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1994 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #158 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #247 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |