H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jean-Rene Lisnard vs Noam Okun H2H: 1-0
Jean-Rene Lisnard holds a 1–0 lead over Noam Okun in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jean-Rene Lisnard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jean-Rene Lisnard won the 2003 Chennai fourth round 6-0 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MON
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2003* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jean-Rene Lisnard | 6-0 2-6 6-2 | Noam Okun | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Noam Okun | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-Rene Lisnard | #1,437 | #84 | 478 | 1,693 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noam Okun | #1,046 | #95 | 411 | 1,628 | 20 | 43 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Noam Okun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #194 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #264 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #97 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #128 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #103 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #295 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #194 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #431 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1437 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |