H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jeff Borowiak vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 2-1
Jeff Borowiak holds a 2–1 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jeff Borowiak leads 1–0 on carpet, while Buster C Mottram leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Borowiak won the 1981 Johannesburg quarterfinal 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 1981* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jeff Borowiak | 7-6 6-3 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| May 23, 1979* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1977* | Dayton | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Jeff Borowiak | 6-3 6-3 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Borowiak | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,941 | 289 | 305 | 48.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jeff Borowiak | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 20–28 | 41.7% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 21–33 | 38.9% | #82 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #40 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #60 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,812 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #98 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #125 | 1,614 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #94 | 1,740 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #98 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,598 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |