H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jeff Borowiak vs Hans Jurgen Pohmann H2H: 1-1
Jeff Borowiak and Hans Jurgen Pohmann are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Borowiak leads 1–0 on carpet, while Hans Jurgen Pohmann leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Borowiak won the 1975 Richmond-Wct third round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 79
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1975* | Richmond-Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jeff Borowiak | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | Match data |
| May 28, 1974* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | 6-3 6-3 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Borowiak | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,941 | 289 | 305 | 48.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Hans Jurgen Pohmann | #511 | #30 | 0 | 1,802 | 119 | 125 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeff Borowiak | Hans Jurgen Pohmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 20–28 | 41.7% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 21–33 | 38.9% | #82 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #40 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #60 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1977 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,812 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #44 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1978 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #98 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #74 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1979 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #125 | 1,614 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #284 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1982 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #94 | 1,740 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1983 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #98 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,598 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |