H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jeff Borowiak vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-1
Jeff Borowiak and Ion Tiriac are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Borowiak leads 1–0 on clay, while Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeff Borowiak won the 1977 Columbus third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1977* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jeff Borowiak | 6-1 6-1 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1973* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 7-6 7-5 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Borowiak | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,941 | 289 | 305 | 48.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeff Borowiak | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 20–28 | 41.7% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 21–33 | 38.9% | #82 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #40 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #60 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,812 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #98 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #125 | 1,614 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1982 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #94 | 1,740 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1983 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #98 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,598 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |