H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jeff Borowiak vs Tony Roche H2H: 1-3
Tony Roche holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Borowiak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tony Roche leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jeff Borowiak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Borowiak won the 1976 Caracas Wct fourth round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1976* | Caracas Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jeff Borowiak | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | Tony Roche | Match data |
| May 9, 1973* | Kansas City | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Tony Roche | 7-6 6-1 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1972* | Boston Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tony Roche | 7-6 6-3 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1972* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tony Roche | 6-3 6-3 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Borowiak | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,941 | 289 | 305 | 48.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Tony Roche | #166 | #8 | 0 | 2,135 | 360 | 191 | 65.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeff Borowiak | Tony Roche | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 20–28 | 41.7% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 21–33 | 38.9% | #82 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 53–35 | 60.2% | — | 1,839 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1974 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #40 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 86–30 | 74.1% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1975 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 55–17 | 76.4% | — | 2,060 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1976 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #60 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | 1977 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,812 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1978 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #98 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 1979 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #125 | 1,614 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #27 | 1,929 | 0 | 18 |
| 30 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #12 | 1,962 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #50 | 2,016 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | 1982 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #94 | 1,740 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #19 | 1,918 | 0 | 20 |
| 33 | 1983 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #98 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #32 | 1,843 | 0 | 21 |
| 34 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,598 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,797 | 0 | 21 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 21 |