H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Jeff Tarango vs Alex Obrien H2H: 2-1
Jeff Tarango holds a 2–1 lead over Alex Obrien in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1997 Boston third round 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1997* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | Alex Obrien | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1994* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Alex Obrien | 6-4 6-4 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| May 7, 1993* | Tampa | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jeff Tarango | 6-7(3) 6-4 1-1 (ret.) | Alex Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alex Obrien | — | — | — | 1,806 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jeff Tarango | Alex Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |