H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 2-2

Jeff Tarango and Andrei Cherkasov are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1997 Hong Kong third round 3-6 7-6(4) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 1997* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #72 3-6 7-6(4) 6-0 Andrei Cherkasov #131 Match data
Aug 16, 1993 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Andrei Cherkasov #47 6-4 6-0 Jeff Tarango #73 Match data
Mar 14, 1993* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeff Tarango #71 6-2 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #41 Match data
Aug 22, 1991* Schenectady ATP 250 R32 Hard Andrei Cherkasov #14 6-2 6-3 Jeff Tarango #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,897 170 198 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #236 1,497 0 0
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,572 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,877 0 1
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1992 29–29 50.0% #32 1,711 0 2
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,753 0 2
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,554 0 2
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,535 0 2
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,463 0 2
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,485 0 2
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,462 0 2
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,483 0 2
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,452 0 2
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —