H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Bryan Shelton H2H: 2-2

Jeff Tarango and Bryan Shelton are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Bryan Shelton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1997 Australian Open first round 2-6 7-6(1) 7-6(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Bryan Shelton
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jeff Tarango #93 2-6 7-6(1) 7-6(2) 6-2 Bryan Shelton #192 Match data
Jul 21, 1993* Washington ATP 250 R64 Hard Jeff Tarango #71 6-2 5-7 6-3 Bryan Shelton #88 Match data
Apr 30, 1993* Atlanta ATP 250 R16 Clay Bryan Shelton #105 6-2 6-3 Jeff Tarango #69 Match data
Mar 19, 1990* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Bryan Shelton #199 7-6 3-6 6-3 Jeff Tarango #149 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Bryan Shelton #1,195 #55 253 1,725 101 136 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Bryan Shelton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1989 1–2 33.3% #164 1,527 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1990 9–17 34.6% #123 1,514 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1991 16–12 57.1% #72 1,636 0 1
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1992 19–24 44.2% #100 1,627 0 2
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 1993 18–25 41.9% #97 1,557 0 2
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 1994 18–21 46.2% #85 1,639 0 2
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1995 11–22 33.3% #150 1,532 0 2
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 1996 6–8 42.9% #190 1,557 0 2
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 1997 3–5 37.5% #283 1,561 0 2
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —