H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Chris Wilkinson H2H: 2-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 2–0 lead over Chris Wilkinson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1996 Japan Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Chris Wilkinson
GBR Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #83 6-4 6-3 Chris Wilkinson #130 Match data Apr 18, 1996* R32 Japan Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jeff Tarango #101 6-0 1-0 (ret.) Chris Wilkinson #127 Match data Mar 8, 1994* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Chris Wilkinson #1,304 #114 392 1,609 26 49 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Chris Wilkinson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #202 1,476 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 1992 2–4 33.3% #171 1,479 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1993 6–7 46.2% #124 1,539 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1994 2–5 28.6% #191 1,558 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 1995 5–7 41.7% #131 1,558 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 1996 3–9 25.0% #178 1,513 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 1997 4–6 40.0% #158 1,554 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 1998 3–6 33.3% #184 1,559 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1999 1–3 25.0% #388 1,549 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango Chris Wilkinson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% — 5 19 24 20.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 19 25 44 43.2% 1 2 3 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Chris Wilkinson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35 1991 1477 99.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — -0.02
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07 1992 1480 99.0 — — — — — — +73 35.3% -0.76 0–1 1–1 — +0.55
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21 1993 1539 118.5 — — — — -46 — +120 51.4% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.95
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60 1994 1558 105.2 — — — — -101 — +123 33.3% -1.11 1–0 0–1 — -0.06
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47 1995 1559 106.9 — — — — -102 — +99 50.0% +0.06 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.10
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 1996 1514 113.8 — — — — -52 — +115 35.7% -0.25 0–2 0–2 — +0.43
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93 1997 1554 115.0 — — — — -71 — +83 41.4% -0.72 3–2 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.05
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45 1998 1560 108.8 — — — — — — +112 44.0% -0.64 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03 1999 1550 95.7 — — — — — — +39 27.3% -0.82 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.27
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1610 114.4 — — — — -69 — +99 41.7% -0.45 10–17 (37%) 13–12 (52%) 98.8 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.