H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Jeff Tarango vs D. Goldie H2H: 0-1
D. Goldie holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, D. Goldie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, D. Goldie won the 1989 Schenectady quarterfinal 1-6 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1989* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | D. Goldie | 1-6 7-6 6-2 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| D. Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeff Tarango | D. Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |