H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs David Prinosil H2H: 3-2

Jeff Tarango holds a 3–2 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 3–1 on hard courts, while David Prinosil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1998 Miami Masters first round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 17, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Jeff Tarango #61 6-1 7-5 David Prinosil #96 Match data
Aug 27, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jeff Tarango #51 6-4 6-2 7-5 David Prinosil #44 Match data
Jan 3, 1997* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #106 6-2 6-4 David Prinosil #39 Match data
Jan 7, 1993* Kuala Lumpur (1) ATP 250 R32 Hard David Prinosil #125 6-2 3-6 7-5 Jeff Tarango #45 Match data
May 29, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay David Prinosil #176 7-6(8) 1-6 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Jeff Tarango #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,800 165 208 44.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,584 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,633 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,630 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1996 24–23 51.1% #39 1,779 0 2
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,633 0 2
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,622 0 2
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,672 0 2
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 2000 22–17 56.4% #38 1,788 0 3
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,606 0 3
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,593 0 3
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,521 0 3
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,515 0 3
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —