H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1992 Manchester fourth round 7-6(6) 0-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 1992* Manchester ATP 250 R16 Grass Jeff Tarango #69 7-6(6) 0-6 6-4 Diego Nargiso #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1988 10–12 45.5% #90 1,621 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,590 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,618 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,603 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,596 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,525 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,530 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,528 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,524 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,612 0 0
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —