H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1992 Eastbourne Open round of 16 7-6(6) 0-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #69 7-6(6) 0-6 6-4 Diego Nargiso #90 Match data Jun 19, 1992* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeff Tarango Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0% 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
31 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.